4 Common Kafka Installation Errors – And Proven Steps to Avoid Them

Apache Kafka is the platform of choice for real-time data processing, but getting it up and running can feel like an uphill battle. 

With high throughput and fault tolerance, companies like Spotify rely on this distributed streamlining platform to deliver seamless services for over 600 million global users – supporting everything from log aggregation and real-time analytics to event sourcing of continuous data streams.

How One AI-Driven Media Platform Cut EBS Costs for AWS ASGs by 48%

How do they ensure their system is reliable and doesn’t fall for any of the most common installation errors? 

This article explores four ways companies go wrong with Kafka, along with proven steps to ensure you don’t do the same. 

How Does Kafka Apache Work?

The best way to think about Kafka’s architecture is to imagine a postal service:

• Brokers: Brokers are like central post offices, but instead of managing mail – they manage the flow of data. Each office stores packages (data) and handles delivery requests (client requests).
• Producers: Producers are the check-in desks where senders (applications) drop off their packages (data) for specific routes (topics).
• Consumers: Consumers are the final delivery destinations where recipients (applications) pick up their packages (data). They can work in groups to manage the load effectively, just as a mail person would arrange multiple delivery points across the same route.  
• Zookeeper: Zookeeper is the central control hub, coordinating the entire postal network. It tracks all post offices (brokers) and ensures smooth, orderly, and efficient operations across the network.

Let’s turn back to the possible installation mistakes now that we have this initial understanding under our belt:

1. Misconfigured Replication Factors

Your “replication factor” dictates how many copies of your data are stored across brokers in a Kafka cluster. A simple misconfiguration of this number can leave you without access to vital data – and bring your company’s operations to a grinding halt.

For example, an eCommerce platform might set their replication factor at 1 during the initial Kafka setup. They plan to go back and adjust it later, but other tasks get in the way. Then, an unexpected power surge hits the data center where one of their Kafka brokers is hosted.

The misconfigured replication factor means the data on that broker is lost, and it has not been replicated on any other brokers. That data includes customer orders, payment confirmation and inventory updates – all essential to daily operations.

Proven Steps to Avoid This Error

1. Set a High Default Number: Ensure you set your replication factor to at least 3, especially if you plan to reconfigure it later. A higher replication factor creates a “backup”, so that even if one broker goes down, another broker will likely still provide access to your data.
2. Use Acknowledgements: If a leader broker fails after acknowledging a write, the followers may not have time to replicate the data – and you may lose the data despite setting a high replication factor. Setting acks to “all” means that all replicas must acknowledge the write before it’s considered successful.
3. Create In-Sync Replicas (ISRs): ISRs are up-to-date replicas with the leader. Aim for at least 2 in-sync replicas per partition. This means that even if the leader fails, another ISR can take over with minimal data loss, maintaining the integrity and availability of your Kafka deployment.

2. Ignoring Kafka Client Library Changes

Kafka’s reputation as a robust platform leads development teams into a false sense of security. A perfect example would be when a company’s Kafka client libraries have just been upgraded.

In their haste to forward new projects, the dev team may need to thoroughly review the release notes or test the new client libraries in a staging environment. But they will realize why this was so important a few hours later – when the customer service team is overwhelmed with calls from corporate clients who are furious about missing or delayed transaction records.

Worse still, this could leave the company in breach of a service-level agreement (SLA). The team now faces the daunting task of rolling back the upgrade and restoring the system’s stability.

Proven Steps to Avoid This Error

1. Review Release Notes: Release notes provide a detailed account of what has changed in the new version of the library. This can include bug fixes, new features, performance improvements, or breaking changes. For example, changes in how messages are batched or acknowledged could affect message ordering and delivery guarantees. This will help you understand how the changes made might impact your system.
2. Test in Staging: The staging environment should mimic your production setup as closely as possible. This ensures that your upgrade does not introduce new instabilities or unexpected behaviors. It gives you an opportunity to identify potential issues, such as a change in the message ordering or compatibility problems, before they cause real-world issues for your company.

3. Lack of Multi-AZ Infrastructure

Budget constraints often force companies to deploy their entire infrastructure from a single region. However, this leaves these companies totally exposed in case of an unexpected outage, such as a fire at the data center. 

Imagine if this happened to a healthcare technology provider: their real-time data is suddenly offline and patients’ lives are at risk. The consequences are immediate and extreme – and could have been avoided if the Kafka clusters were distributed more widely.

Proven Steps to Avoid This Error

1. Distribute Deployment: Replicate resources across multiple availability zones (AZs).. This creates resilience because if one spot hits a snag, the others remain intact. Such redundancy is essential to keep things running smoothly no matter what, even if one region goes down.
2. Ensure the proper replication factor.

4. Curruptions and Data Loss

Data failure is a daily reality for many companies, but some Kafka consumers fail when processing this corrupted data. This can have a cascading effect, where lagging data transmission causes more problems down the chain.

Many organizations don’t implement adequate data failure-handling strategies; they simply hope data failure won’t occur. The result is that relatively small problems like message failures can turn into much larger problems across the entire system. 

Proven Steps to Avoid This Error

1. Implement Consumer Groups: Consumer groups distribute message processing across multiple consumers. If one consumer fails, others can continue processing – avoiding lost or delayed access to data.
2. Set Up Retries With Exponential Backoff: Configure the application to retry requests that ended in errors, with a reasonable “wait time” between successive attempts. This increases the likelihood that the system overcomes temporary issues and succeeds on successive tries – without overwhelming the system.
3. Use Dead Letter Queues (DLQs): These can capture messages that fail repeatedly. They act as a safety net for messages that fail after multiple attempts, diverting them to a safe location so they don’t block other messages.
4. Monitor the Cluster: Set up comprehensive monitoring for all Kafka clusters using critical metrics like message lag, broker health, and partition availability. This helps you identify and address issues more quickly.

Enhance Your Kafka Set-up With GlobalDots

GlobalDots has helped numerous global clients select and implement the best solutions on the market to eliminate oversights and avoid unexpected failures. The result? More reliable data streamlines with less effort and fewer technical challenges.

Want to learn more about our curated portfolio?